Divorce for denial of ‘conjugal bliss’ okay-ed by Delhi High Court

0
797
3 of 4
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

“The version of the wife that her husband had an adulterous relationship has not been made good by her during her evidence. She could not name the girl. She did not depose to any fact wherefrom an adulterous relationship could be gathered,” it noted.

The man had moved trial court seeking divorce contending that his wife had initially “resisted consummation of the marriage stating that she had a mental block towards sex” and had later left the matrimonial house.

3 of 4
Use your ← → (arrow) keys to browse

LEAVE A REPLY