In its order, the court said, “The language should have been eschewed.”
“The petitioner has also referred to the implementation of the demonetisation policy which is alleged to have caused loss of life and disruption of economic livelihood,” it said.
This would be matter of implementation rather than challenge to the policy and the Supreme Court is already seized of the issue, it said.
“We are, thus, not inclined to entertain this petition, a coordinate bench of this court having examined the whole issue in another writ petition before the Madurai bench decided on 10.11.2016. Writ petition stands dismissed,” the court said.
